Current:Home > reviewsThree decades later, gynecologist is accused of using own sperm to inseminate patient -Secure Growth Academy
Three decades later, gynecologist is accused of using own sperm to inseminate patient
View
Date:2025-04-12 17:06:19
An Idaho woman who received fertility treatment from her gynecologist is suing him after she learned the doctor used his own sperm to inseminate her more than three decades ago.
A lawsuit, filed by Sharon Hayes in Spokane County Superior Court, claims former Spokane, Washington Dr. David R. Claypool violated the state's medical malpractice statute which requires doctors to get informed consent from patients for treatment.
This spring, Hayes' 33-year-old daughter initially took an at-home DNA test seeking answers about" "ongoing health issues," the lawsuit claims, and learned not only was the ex-OBG-YN her biological father, but she shares DNA with 16 people in Washington state.
Hayes, of Kootenai County, about 30 miles east of Spokane, is the among throngs of women who have alleged they were tricked by a doctor they trusted to inseminate them with sperm from chosen or anonymous donors. The women all claim they didn't learn the identity of their child's father until their children took genetic tests − some until decades after they were born.
"My initial reaction was deep, deeply rooted guilt, for even finding out this information, because my mom never told me about any of this until I took the DNA test," Hayes's daughter, Brianna Hayes, who took the test, told KREM-TV.
Woman awarded millions for malpractice:Florida woman impregnated with doctor's sperm in artificial insemination awarded $5.25 million
Anonymous donor use
According to the eight-page suit, in 1989 Claypool, whose license expired in 2010 according to the Washington State Department of Health, allegedly told Hayes "he would obtain donor genetic material from anonymous donors such as college and/or medical students who physically resembled (Hayes) husband at the time."
He then performed multiple artificial inseminations on Hayes and, the suit claims, each time made her pay $100 in cash for the procedure.
After "at least" the second artificial insemination, Hayes became pregnant, the suit reads, and Claypool never told her he used his own sperm for the process.
Fertility treatment costs in the US: Breaking down price ranges for IVF, IUI and more
'Materially different'
Hayes daughter, born in June of 1990, uploaded previously obtained genetic test results to MyHeritage.com on March 6, 2022 which revealed Claypool is her father. The suit goes on to say the former doctor's physical characteristics "were materially different" than those of Hayes' husband.
As a result, the suit claims Hayes suffered "severe and traumatic emotional distress, sleeplessness, anxiety, and disruptions in her relationship with her daughters" along with other unnamed damages due to Claypool's reported medical negligence.
According to to the suit, Claypool allegedly violated the state's medical malpractice statute, which requires doctors to get informed consent from patients for treatment.
IVF lawsuit mixup:An IVF mom gave birth to someone else's babies. Couple sues clinic, alleges massive mix-up
A secret practice
There is no law in Washington state that prohibits doctors from covertly using their own sperm to artificially inseminate a patient and it has proven difficult to patrol fertility fraud because few states have relevant criminal or civil statutes.
At the federal level, laws criminalize fertility fraud, but federal prosecutors have successfully used generally applicable federal criminal statutes to charge people "for engaging in conduct connected with fertility fraud schemes," according to a fact sheet from the Federation of American Scientists.
"It's very clear what informed consent is, and in this case, Sharon selected a profile that was clearly not Dr. Claypool," said RJ Ermola, the Hayes family's lawyer, told KREM-TV the outlet. "We feel very confident that he violated the medical malpractice statute."
The lawsuit, which also names Claypool's wife as a defendant in the case, seeks financial damages and requests a trial.
Claypool's attorney, Drew Dalton, could not immediately be reached Monday morning for comment.
Contributing: Kevin McCoy.
Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at [email protected] and follow her on X @nataliealund.
veryGood! (6815)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Ranking
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That