Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -Secure Growth Academy
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-11 02:51:13
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (32529)
Related
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Are Lana Del Rey and Quavo dating? They play lovers in new 'Tough' music video
- Copa América 2024: Will Messi play Argentina vs. Ecuador quarterfinal match? Here's the latest.
- Tony-winning musical ‘Suffs’ disrupted by chanting protesters with a banner
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- How much TV is OK for little kids? Making screen time work for your family
- Josh Hartnett Shares His Daughters' Adorable Reactions to Attending Taylor Swift's Eras Tour
- Trump or Biden? Investors are anxious about the 2024 election. Here's how to prepare
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Dress appropriately and you can get a free Krispy Kreme doughnut on July 4th: Here's how
Ranking
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Tony-winning musical ‘Suffs’ disrupted by chanting protesters with a banner
- 7 new and upcoming video games for summer 2024, including Luigi's Mansion 2 HD
- Cybersecurity breach could delay court proceedings across New Mexico, public defenders office says
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- The questions about Biden’s age and fitness are reminiscent of another campaign: Reagan’s in 1984
- 4 major takeaways from the Supreme Court's most consequential term in years
- Massachusetts lawmakers seek to expand scope of certain sexual offenses
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
About the security and return rate of LANDUN FINANCIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE LTD platform
Jane Fonda says being 'white and famous' provided her special treatment during 2019 arrest
How much TV is OK for little kids? Making screen time work for your family
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Christian McCaffrey Slams Evil Influencer for Criticizing Olivia Culpo's Wedding Dress
At half a mile a week, Texas border wall will take around 30 years and $20 billion to build
In letters, texts and posts, Jan. 6 victims react to Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunity