Current:Home > MyFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -Secure Growth Academy
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:40:17
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- President Biden: Climate champion or fossil fuel friend?
- An Energy Transition Needs Lots of Power Lines. This 1970s Minnesota Farmers’ Uprising Tried to Block One. What Can it Teach Us?
- Great Scott! 30 Secrets About Back to the Future Revealed
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- SVB, now First Republic: How it all started
- 2 states launch an investigation of the NFL over gender discrimination and harassment
- Light a Sparkler for These Stars Who Got Married on the 4th of July
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Jesse Palmer Teases Wild Season of Bachelor in Paradise
Ranking
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- 25 Cooling Products for People Who Are Always Hot
- 25 Cooling Products for People Who Are Always Hot
- New Study Identifies Rapidly Emerging Threats to Oceans
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Lack of Loggers Is Hobbling Arizona Forest-Thinning Projects That Could Have Slowed This Year’s Devastating Wildfires
- Scientists Are Pursuing Flood-Resistant Crops, Thanks to Climate-Induced Heavy Rains and Other Extreme Weather
- The US May Have Scored a Climate Victory in Congress, but It Will Be in the Hot Seat With Other Major Emitters at UN Climate Talks
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Elon Musk says 'I've hired a new CEO' for Twitter
Warming Trends: Nature and Health Studies Focused on the Privileged, $1B for Climate School and Old Tires Detour Into Concrete
SpaceX wants this supersized rocket to fly. But will investors send it to the Moon?
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Has JPMorgan Chase grown too large? A former White House economic adviser weighs in
Pamper Yourself With the Top 18 Trending Beauty Products on Amazon Right Now
Ahead of COP27, New Climate Reports are Warning Shots to a World Off Course