Current:Home > reviewsPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -Secure Growth Academy
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-18 14:42:25
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (28567)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- In Philadelphia, Mass Transit Officials Hope Redesigning Bus Routes Will Boost Post-Pandemic Ridership
- Boohoo Drops a Size-Inclusive Barbie Collab—and Yes, It's Fantastic
- Pete Davidson Enters Rehab for Mental Health
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Venezuela sees some perks of renewed ties with Colombia after years of disputes
- The math behind Dominion Voting System's $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox News
- 45 Lululemon Finds I Predict Will Sell Out 4th of July Weekend: Don’t Miss These Buys Starting at $9
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Rural Electric Co-ops in Alabama Remain Way Behind the Solar Curve
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Now on Hold, Georgia’s Progressive Program for Rooftop Solar Comes With a Catch
- AI companies agree to voluntary safeguards, Biden announces
- Gen Z is the most pro union generation alive. Will they organize to reflect that?
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Why Tia Mowry Says Her 2 Kids Were Part of Her Decision to Divorce Cory Hardrict
- Will There Be a Barbie Movie Sequel? Margot Robbie Says...
- Travis Scott Will Not Face Criminal Charges Over Astroworld Tragedy
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Maryland Gets $144 Million in Federal Funds to Rehabilitate Aging Water Infrastructure
Pete Davidson Admits His Mom Defended Him on Twitter From Burner Account
The Fate of Protected Wetlands Are At Stake in the Supreme Court’s First Case of the Term
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Biden bets big on bringing factories back to America, building on some Trump ideas
How America's largest newspaper company is leaving behind news deserts
Climate Envoy John Kerry Seeks Restart to US Emissions Talks With China