Current:Home > MarketsNew Yorkers may change their constitution to ban discrimination over ‘pregnancy outcomes’ -Secure Growth Academy
New Yorkers may change their constitution to ban discrimination over ‘pregnancy outcomes’
View
Date:2025-04-13 12:50:23
Follow live: Updates from AP’s coverage of the presidential election.
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — An amendment to New York’s constitution that would bar discrimination based on things including “gender identity” and “pregnancy outcomes” is up for a final vote Tuesday amid debate over how much it might affect future abortion and transgender rights.
Supporters and opponents disagree sharply about the potential legal impact of the Equal Rights Amendment, also known as Proposition 1.
New York’s constitution currently forbids discrimination based on race, creed or religion. The amendment would add language that says someone cannot be denied civil rights because of their national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes or “reproductive healthcare and autonomy.”
Democratic leaders put the amendment on the ballot partly in hopes of boosting turnout by voters passionate about protecting abortion access, in an election year where U.S. House races in New York could help decide which party controls Congress.
Several other states also have abortion-related constitutional amendments on their ballots Tuesday. Most of those ballot questions address head-on when it should be legal to end a pregnancy. But in New York, state lawmakers took the indirect approach of writing the amendment as an antidiscrimination measure.
Democrats who support the amendment have argued that the new language would create a legal framework where any restrictions on abortion would amount to an unconstitutional form of discrimination in medical care. The New York City Bar Association has agreed with that assessment, as have some other legal experts.
Still, the fact that the amendment itself does not use the word abortion has caused headaches for its supporters. It also opened the door for opponents to claim its other language would lead to a raft of unintended consequences.
Republicans have run a strong messaging campaign against the amendment, choosing not to focus on what protections it might provide for abortion, but to target other parts of the proposal. Their main attack line has been to argue the amendment would provide a constitutional right for transgender athletes to play on girls’ sports teams.
They’ve also argued that its language on national origin could result in noncitizens being allowed to vote, that its ban on age discrimination might take away price discounts for senior citizens, and that it could also wind up stopping parents from having a say in their child’s medical care.
Previous state court decisions have found that existing language in the state constitution bars noncitizens from voting. And the New York City Bar Association says the amendment would not block existing state laws requiring parental consent for a child’s medical care.
Legal battles are already underway in New York over whether existing state and federal laws give transgender people the right to play on sports teams that match the gender identity.
Democrats in the state legislature voted to put the amendment on the 2024 ballot after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Voters elsewhere have shown support for abortion access in previous elections. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll recently found that 7 in 10 Americans think abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
Uncertainty over the New York amendment’s impact on abortion was pronounced enough, however, that it caused even the state Board of Elections to throw up its hands. The board is responsible for writing simple explanations of proposed amendments that voters will see on their ballots. But rather than interpret the measure or include the word abortion in its description, the board decided to reiterate the amendment’s language verbatim.
The 2024 election is here. This is what to know:
- Complete coverage: The latest Election Day updates from our reporters.
- Election results: Know the latest race calls from AP as votes are counted across the U.S.
- Voto a voto: Sigue la cobertura de AP en español de las elecciones en EEUU.
News outlets around the world count on the AP for accurate U.S. election results. Since 1848, the AP has been calling races up and down the ballot. Support us. Donate to the AP.
Supporters of the amendment objected and filed lawsuit, but the judge in the case, David A. Weinstein, eventually declined to make the board rewrite its description, in part because he could not say for certain how courts would interpret the amendment’s language.
Abortion is currently legal in New York up through 24 weeks from the beginning of pregnancy. After that, it is only legal if the pregnant person’s life, physical health or mental health is at risk, or if a medical provider determines the fetus is not viable. Although there is no defined time frame, viability is a term used by health care providers to describe whether a pregnancy is expected to continue developing normally or whether a fetus might survive outside the uterus.
Democrats have firm control of state government in New York, making any new abortion restrictions unlikely in the near future.
Backers of the proposal argue that if the amendment passes it would create a strong layer of abortion protections in New York that would be difficult for a future legislature to repeal. That’s because New York requires the legislature to pass an amendment to the constitution two times before it goes to voters for final approval.
veryGood! (39)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
- South Carolina to take a break from executions for the holidays
- Outgoing North Carolina governor grants 2 pardons, 6 commutations
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Inter Miami's MLS playoff failure sets stage for Messi's last act, Alexi Lalas says
- 2 striking teacher unions in Massachusetts face growing fines for refusing to return to classroom
- Jake Paul's only loss led him to retool the team preparing him to face Mike Tyson
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- J.Crew Outlet Quietly Drops Their Black Friday Deals - Save Up to 70% off Everything, Styles Start at $12
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Today Reveals Hoda Kotb's Replacement
- Today's Craig Melvin Replacing Hoda Kotb: Everything to Know About the Beloved Anchor
- Whoopi Goldberg calling herself 'a working person' garners criticism from 'The View' fans
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- South Carolina to take a break from executions for the holidays
- Jason Kelce Offers Up NSFW Explanation for Why Men Have Beards
- New York nursing home operator accused of neglect settles with state for $45M
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Satire publication The Onion buys Alex Jones’ Infowars at auction with help from Sandy Hook families
Seattle man faces 5 assault charges in random sidewalk stabbings
Kentucky governor says investigators will determine what caused deadly Louisville factory explosion
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Jimmy Kimmel, more late-night hosts 'shocked' by Trump Cabinet picks: 'Goblins and weirdos'
Democrat Janelle Bynum flips Oregon’s 5th District, will be state’s first Black member of Congress
'Survivor' 47, Episode 9: Jeff Probst gave players another shocking twist. Who went home?